Wednesday, October 31, 2012

In Sandy\'s Wake, Hard-Earned Advice From Asia: Pull Together

HONG KONG - Readers from around the world, and especially those in Asia, have responded graciously to our Facebook call seeking advice for storm-affected Americans, as folks along the Eastern Seaboard try to recover from the lashings of Hurricane Sandy this week.

“Be prepared!” said Redgz Tapalla-Molidor of the Philippines. “Listen to warnings given by weather forecasters. We've been hit by a lot of strong tropical storms, our secret in coping up is bayanihan.”

Bayanihan is a term used by Filipinos to describe a communal spirit, a coming-together to overcome a crisis or to reach a common goal. To get through the flooding of Manila in August, as we wrote on Rendezvous, “on social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter, and through text messages, Filipinos demonstrated a remarkable civic spirit as they shared news of evacuation centers and dropoff points for donations of emergency supplies.”

As Ms. Tapalla-Molidor says:

Rich or poor, famous or not, people help each other. We donate, lend equipment, and extend a helping hand. We lose our hard-earned possessions but we are still alive and our families, that's faith. Victims also undergo counseling especially the kids. They were given school supplies and toys so they can move on with their studies and be productive. Hope this helps.

Asia, of necessity, knows its way around natural disasters. Typhoon season is an annual worry for Pacific Islanders and those in coastal areas of Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Vietnam and Thailand. The Philippines sits in the middle of what might be called Typhoon Alley, and Filipinos are regularly tormented by tropical superstorms, floods and mudslides. The storms in August overwhelmed Manila, killing at least 11 people and leaving a quarter-million homeless.

Eva Cakau from Fiji offered this advice:

Adopt a “Get back to normal as quick as possible” mentality and start the c leanup. My little town never waited for handouts or help from authorities when we were hit by massive floodings due to a cyclone. We just got up and did the best we could. When the authorities did finally reach us like one month later, everything was up and running again. We went without water and power supply for 10 days….and managed to pump water from a creek to clean up the mess.

Diesel generators, water blasters, canned foods and lots of batteries for torches were our biggest help! But mental toughness got us thru!

Many countries in the Asia-Pacific region are vulnerable to Ring of Fire earthquakes and their follow-on effects, including the massive Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 and the earthquake-tsunami disaster in March 2011 that killed an estimated 18,000 Japanese, crushed Japan's northeastern coast and crippled the Fukushima nuclear complex. Christchurch, New Zealand, was badly damaged just before Christmas last year, and Indonesia and China routinely tremble from quakes.

Jules Mauri Venning of Timaru, New Zealand, says he “came through quakes by communicating with family, friends, setting limits to work commitments, pacing self and giving myself time out as necessary, also set a strategy for what would be achieved.”

And Denise O'Toole writes:

I lived in Chengdu, China when the Wenchuan earthquake struck Sichuan Province in 2008 and killed 88,000. People relied on each other, friends and strangers alike, in unprecedented ways that truly surprised the Chinese people. Recognizing our shared humanity, offering kindnesses large and small, and accepting help when offered got people through very dark times. . . and had a lasting impact on how people saw themselves and others.

Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar in 2008 killed more than 130,000 people flattened almost everything in the southern rice-growing delta. The brutal military junta at the time was monstrously inept i n relief efforts, even refusing aid shipments waiting just offshore in U.S. Navy ships. The regime's dithering and the people's anguish had a politically cyclonic effect on one senior general: U Thein Sein is now the president of the country and leading a new wave of democratic reforms there.

There also was a glimmer of a political breakthrough in the storm region in the United States this week, as Chris Christie, the Republican governor of New Jersey, made a tour of battered areas with Barack Obama, the Democratic president. In one interview, Mr. Christie said that “the president has been all over this and deserves great credit.”

“I hope the American people can transfer this disaster to an occasion for solidarity and brotherhood between all the classes of society and every religions and races,” Farous Tounsi wrote to us.

And Anne Murphy of Queens Village, New York, said of our Facebook comments that it “sounds like most people across the world of fer the same thoughts as those in this country who have gone through devastation.”

“I think we are blessed that we haven't seen natural disasters with the loss of life scale seen by some of the people in this discussion,” Ms. Murphy said. “God bless us all in times like these. Attitude and each other make a big difference.”



Recreating Merce Cunningham, Frame by Frame

Paris-Merce Cunningham's “Un Jour ou deux,” which opens at the Paris Opera Ballet on Wednesday night on a double bill with Marie-Agnès Gillot's “Sous Apparance,” is a curiosity even for Cunningham aficionados. Originally 90 minutes long, set to a complex score by John Cage, it was created for the Paris Opera Ballet in 1973-and despite the admiration for Cunningham's work that the French had shown well before the United States followed suit, the work caused an outcry at its premiere.

“Some people loved it, but many people come to the opera for diversion, and it was difficult for them,” said Brigitte Lefèvre, the director of the Paris Opera Ballet.

Ms. Lefèvre was speaking during a rehearsal break on Saturday as musicians set up stations with blocks of wood and percussive instruments in the orchestra pit, readying themselves for the difficulties of the Cage score, which demands improvisation from the players and keeps them moving around the pit.

Ms. Lefèvre's own relationship with Cunningham goes back a long way. She was instrumental in bringing the choreographer's work to France when she and Jacques Garnier, a fellow Paris Opera dancer, founded le Theatre du Silence in 1971 and were given permission to perform “Summerspace” and “Changing Steps.”

“Merce was amused that we were going to perform our own work on a program with his pieces,” she said. “He had such a generous spirit: the contrast genuinely interested him.”

Despite the contentious reception of “Un Jour ou deux” (A Day or Two), the Paris Opera brought it back in 1986, and Cunningham cut it to just over 60 minutes. Whether because it now shared a program (with Rudolf Nureyev's “Washington Square”) rather than being performed alone, or whether Cunningham felt it was too long, isn't clear, said Robert Swinston, a Cunningham dancer who, with Jennifer Goggans, reconstructed the work for the current season.

“Be cause it hadn't been performed since 1986, the process was an extremely painstaking one,” Mr. Swinston said after the rehearsal, as stagehands rolled up flooring on the raked Palais Garnier stage. There were blurry videos, he said, of one rehearsal and one performance, from both the 1973 and 1986 runs, but no clear indications of many specific parts for the 25-strong ensemble. (Unlike most Cunningham works, “Un Jour” has principal roles, and the central couple was danced during both seasons by Wilifried Piollet and Jean Guizerix; those, as well as three soloist parts, were more easily reconstructed.)

Together with Laurent Hilaire, a former étoile who is now a ballet master at the Opera, and who performed one of the solo roles in 1986, Mr. Swinston and Ms. Goggans watched blown-up, slowed-down sections of the dance to identify the dancers and then track them throughout the piece, creating detailed graphs to keep track of who was where when.

“Improved tec hnology actually enabled us to put this together,” he said. “What you could barely see on the grainy video became at least vaguely apparent with high-definition screening.”

As with any reconstruction, there were decisions to be made. “There were moments, specially with partnering, when you could get the general effect of a movement, but not exactly how it was being achieved,” said Ms. Goggans. “So we had to experiment until it looked right.”

And Mr. Swinston said that in many cases they stuck to the 1973, rather than the 1986, version because they believed Cunningham's intentions were clearer in that version.

What the discussion revealed is the delicate, difficult business of putting together a dance that hasn't been performed for 26 years, when the choreographer is no longer alive. Video is blurry; dancers may have made mistakes; memories fade. Often, Mr. Swinston said, it's a judgment call, a decision about what you think the choreographer would have wanted.

There will no doubt be dedicated Cunningham followers in the audience to decide whether Mr. Swinston and Ms. Goggans got it right, and whether the Paris Opera dancers do justice to the master's precise, demanding work. Like all of Cunningham's work, “Un Jour ou Deux” asks the audience for concentration and immersion in a universe as full of surprising wonders as nature itself.

“It's not necessarily an easy piece, but I am thrilled to bring it back, specially in the centenary year of John Cage,” Ms. Lefèvre said. “I think it's a masterpiece, and I'm proud that it's ours.”



Bond May Be No Saint, but He\'s Worthy of Vatican Attention

ROME - In its Wednesday edition, the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano commemorated two topical dates with full-page spreads: the 500th anniversary of the inauguration of the Sistine Chapel â€" which took place under Pope Julius II on Oct. 31, 1512 - and the 50-year run of the James Bond franchise.

Now, Michelangelo's masterpiece is the subject of regular reports in the Vatican mouthpiece, but it's rarer for a fictional character with a license to kill (and a rather cavalier attitude when it comes to sex outside of marriage) to draw this kind of glowing coverage, even if the occasion is the Italian release Wednesday of the latest Bond film, “Skyfall.”

As interpreted by Daniel Craig and envisioned by the director Sam Mendes, this Bond is “less of a cliché, less attracted by the pleasures of life, much darker and more introspective,” the Osservatore film critic Gaetano Vallini wrote in one of five articles dedicated to the Ian Fleming spy. “And be cause of this he is more human, even able to be moved and to cry.” (Mr. Vallini did also note that the movie had plenty of exotic locations, supervillains, vodka martinis and “extremely beautiful Bond girls.”)

To honor James Bond is to recognize the character's role in popular culture, said the paper's editor in chief, Giovanni Maria Vian, adding that the newspaper's mandate is “to pay attention to the cultural phenomena of our time,” whether comics, pop music or film. In recent years, the newspaper has commended popular favorites like the Blues Brothers and the Beatles' White Album.

Mr. Bond “may be a stylized hero, but he's on the side of good,” Mr. Vian said. “He is elegant, pokes fun at himself, overall he's more human.”



\'National Rejuvenation\'? Or Chinese Fascism?

BEIJING - In the Chongwenmen area of China's capital, a major shopping district near Beijing Railway Station that heaves with consumers every evening, a giant electronic screen stretches across the top of a road exhorting shoppers to work toward the great “rejuvenation of the Chinese people.” It glows red and yellow in the night sky, the colors of the national flag.

It's scenes like this that explain why some Chinese and foreign scholars are wondering if the seeds of a fascist-style ideology lie in the ground here, or are already sprouting.

After all, the concept of national rejuvenation was rooted in extreme nationalism and fascist thinking in the last century, when both Hitler and Mussolini espoused citizens' duty to recover an ancient strength and glory. And there is a Chinese precedent: Before the Communist takeover in 1949, the Nationalist leader, Chiang Kaishek, had a “China Revival Society,” led by “Blue Shirts,” modeled on Mussolini's Blac k Shirts.

An extreme thesis? Certainly, it calls for robust debate. In my latest column, I explore whether what is happening in today's China can be seen as fascism and the limitations of that term.

According to a report on Tencent, one of China's biggest Web platforms, the concept of “great rejuvenation” (“weida fuxing,”) began in 1997 after the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party. (The 18th congress begins next week.) “Great national rejuvenation” replaced a phrase that sounds milder in Chinese, “zhenxing zhonghua,” or “national revival,” the Topics Today post said.

By now the idea is widely used in official rhetoric. Recently, a researcher at the National Development and Reform Commission, Yang Yiyong, provoked broad online debate when he announced that China had achieved 62 percent of its planned “national rejuvenation.” (China's netizens are a critical bunch and many poured scorn on the attempt to quantify such a conce pt.)

For Wang Lixiong, a Beijing-based writer and scholar, the strongly nationalist trend in China today is a cause for concern.

An expert on Tibet and Xinjiang, Mr. Wang believes the official emphasis on nationalism is veering into something more disturbing - a kind of racism, as the majority Han people who dominate government struggle to control the two restive autonomous regions, he said in an interview via Skype in Beijing.

“Internally, we're seeing racism towards the Tibetans and in Xinjiang, and externally, I feel that now we're not necessarily quite there yet, but the signs are already there, a kind of expansionism and nationalism is becoming dominant in China's external relations,” Mr. Wang said.

He described a trip he took, from Golmud in Qinghai province, to Lhasa, the capital of the Tibet Autonomous Region.

“Recently I drove from Golmud to Lhasa and there were 17 police checks, and they separated out the Han and the Tibetans, wh o was allowed to pass, who wasn't allowed into Lhasa,” he said. The Han were allowed to travel on while Tibetans were generally not. “So the racism is very clear,” he said.

The Chinese government, for its part, strongly argues that it has worked hard to modernize Tibet and Xinjiang and spread economic progress, and that it operates policies that give advantages to ethnic minorities, including easier access to university education or allowing them to have more children.



Europe Ready to Send Military Trainers as Mali War Looms

LONDON - The European Union is ready to send troops to prepare an offensive against renegade Islamist troops occupying northern Mali, a fiefdom that could become a springboard for terrorist attacks on Europe.

“It's 1,200 kilometers from France and from Europe. Therefore our security is at stake,” Jean-Yves Le Drian, the French defense minister, said on Tuesday.

However, the Union's contribution to an African-led international effort to oust the Qaeda-linked militants is likely to be limited to a few hundred military trainers. “I haven't heard from member states a willingness to put people in the field,” an E.U. official told Reuters.

The crisis has been building since mutinous soldiers staged a coup in Bamako, the Malian capital, in March.

Separatist Tuareg tribesmen grabbed the opportunity to seize the north, but they were promptly pushed aside by radical Islamists. The radicals have imposed a brutal fundamentalist regime on two-thirds of t he country, funded with the proceeds of drug, cigarette and people smuggling.

Six French hostages are being held there by the local affiliate of Al Qaeda. The same group, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, has been linked to the death of J. Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi last month.

France, the former colonial power in Mali, took the initiative in pushing for a United Nations Security Council resolution that this month cleared the way for military intervention if the crisis of the breakaway north cannot be resolved peacefully.

The French and their European partners fear that Mali could become a new terrorist haven like Somalia, but this time much closer to the Continent.

Alain Praud, a reader of France's Le Monde, suggested the Islamist takeover in the north had more to do with crime than religion.

“The desert bandits, who have long trafficked in slaves, are now doing the same with drugs, weapons and illegal immigrants,” he wrote in an online comment. “The banner of Islam is serving as a cover for hypocrites.”

António Guterres, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees and a former prime minister of Portugal, wrote in a Global Opinion article last month:

If unchecked, the Mali crisis threatens to create an arc of instability extending west into Mauritania and east through Niger, Chad and Sudan to the Horn of Africa and the Gulf of Aden, characterized by extended spaces where state authority is weak and pockets of territorial control are exercised by transnational criminals.

The perceived threat has proved sufficient to involve the United States, which this week sought the support of Algeria in the international effort to oust the Islamists.

My colleague Michael R. Gordon wrote from Algiers that Hillary Rodham Clinton, the visiting U.S. Secretary of State, agreed to pursue a dialog with the North African state on the most effect ive approaches to take.

It is already apparent that, if it comes to a shooting war, Malian and other African troops would be doing the fighting, with Europe picking up the bill and providing training.

Germany is among the countries that have said it would send military trainers, despite some skepticism among the German public.

“The mission threatens to become a failure, particularly because time is running out,” according to Germany's Der Spiegel.

“If the Malian army and the West African intervention force hope to invade the north before the hot summer, the Europeans will have to begin their training activities in the winter,” according to magazine. “And if they delay the mission, the Islamists will have plenty of time to strengthen their positions.”



IHT Quick Read: Wednesday, Oct. 31

NEWS The New York region began the daunting process of rebuilding in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, a storm that remade the landscape and rewrote the record books as it left behind a tableau of damage, destruction and grief. Updates on the storm aftermath and recovery.

European newspaper and magazine publishers, frustrated by their inability to make money from the Web, say Google should pay them, because they provide the material on which the Web giant is generating its revenue. In several European countries, they are close to getting their way. Eric Pfanner reports from Paris.

Immigrants in Catalonia have helped make the economy both the largest among Spain's regions and among the most diverse, with sizable populations of Muslims, Sikhs, Chinese and others. But as Catalonia prepares for an election that could become an unofficial referendum on independence, as many as 1.5 million residents of the total population of 7.5 million will not be eligible to vo te because they are not Spanish citizens. Raphael Minder reports from Badalona, Spain.

UBS, the Swiss bank, announced plans on Tuesday to eliminate up to 10,000 jobs. Mark Scott reports from London.

Defying the worst European auto sales in 20 years and deepening losses in the region, the chief executive of Fiat said Tuesday that he would not close any of the carmaker's underused factories in Italy and vowed to repeat the turnaround he has already led at Chrysler. Jack Ewing reports from Frankfurt.

ARTS Three new plays shake up the Off-West End and put it at center stage. Matt Wolf on London theater.

SPORTS The referee Mark Clattenburg stands accused of using racial slurs during a match between Chelsea and Manchester United. Has the media over-hyped the story? Rob Hughes on soccer.



Tuesday, October 30, 2012

As Violence Continues, Rohingya Find Few Defenders in Myanmar

HONG KONG - Violence has continued this week in western Myanmar, as an apparent campaign of ethnic cleansing is being carried out against the Muslim minority group known as the Rohingya - with little response or outcry from Aung San Suu Kyi or other human rights and pro-democracy activists in the country.

A group of several thousand Burmese marched on a Rohingya village on Tuesday to force the residents there to relocate, according to a new report from Radio Free Asia. At least one person was killed when security forces fired on the mob.

Over the past 10 days, violence by extremists and vigilantes in Rakhine State has left at least 89 people dead. Nearly 30,000 people have been rendered homeless, most of them Muslims, pushed into squalid refugee camps. Countless other Rohingya have taken to the sea in a frantic exodus of houseboats, barges and fishing vessels.

Satellite photos published by Human Rights Watch showed a Muslim sector in the town of Kyaukpyu leveled by what appeared to be methodical and premeditated arson - more than 600 homes and nearly 200 houseboats were destroyed. Before-and-after images of the sector can be seen here.

“The opposition, including democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi and other prominent figures, has hopelessly failed to intervene or calm the situation,” said the analyst and editor Aung Zaw in a commentary published Monday in his magazine, Irrawaddy.

“Many, especially in the international community and human rights organizations, were disheartened to see such inaction from those who still claim to represent the democracy movement.”

Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi has been notably restrained in the few comments she has made on the Rohingya clashes, generally saying that both sides are culpable and that the rule of law must prevail. But the Burmese activist Maung Zarni, a visiting fellow at the London School of Economics, said Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi's belief that the violence was purely s ectarian showed “a shocking naivete.”

“She should know better,” Maung Zarni said, adding that the Rohingya now have so few advocates in Myanmar that they've become “a people who feel they are drowning in the sea of Burma's popular ‘Buddhist' racist nationalism.”

During a forum at Harvard's Kennedy School last month, according to a story in Global Post, a student from Thailand asked Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi to “explain why you have been so reluctant” to comment about the oppression of the Rohingya.

“The mood in the room suddenly shifted,” the article said. “Suu Kyi's tone and expression changed. With an edge in her voice, she answered: ‘You must not forget that there have been human rights violations on both sides of the communal divide. It's not a matter of condemning one community or the other. I condemn all human rights violations.' ”

The South Asia director of Human Rights Watch, Meenakshi Ganguly, said in a statement quoted by Zee News:

The Rohingyas seem to have become the nowhere people. The authorities in Burma have failed to protect them, and Bangladesh refuses to provide asylum to those fleeing the attacks.

It appears that many are in stranded in boats hoping for refuge. India, with its long history of providing shelter, in fact to both Burmese and Bangladeshi refugees, should perhaps press both governments to do the right thing.

Burma needs to act swiftly to ensure the rights of its Rohingya population instead of disputing their citizenship. Bangladesh should open its borders and provide relief.

The Rohingya, who are Muslim, are not recognized as citizens by the Myanmar government, nor are they are among the 135 official ethnic groups in the country formerly known as Burma. Deeply impoverished and effectively stateless, the Rohingya are viewed by the Buddhist majority as unwelcome immigrants who have crossed over illegally from neighborin g Bangladesh.

Just getting the terms and identifiers right can be a challenge. The Rohingya are referred to locally as Bengalis, after their language. And members of the Buddhist majority in the area are typically called Rakhines, after the state. Rakhine State was formerly known as Arakan, and the people there are sometimes called the Araknese.

It was a bloody summer in Rakhine, with anti-Muslim riots triggered in June by the rape and murder of a young Buddhist woman, a crime that was blamed on Muslims. Dozens were killed in the fighting, and 75,000 fled, most of them Muslims.

President Thein Sein initiated a Riot Inquiry Commission after that violence and asked for the panel's findings by Nov. 14. That deadline, commission members say, will not be met.

“We do not have enough cooperation from all sides,” said one member, Maung Thura, the country's most famous comedian, who is widely known as Zarganar, his stage name.

“The local ethnic Rak hine, Muslim community, government offices, and even the members of Parliament have become increasingly less willing to participate,” Zarganar, a former political prisoner, told Radio Free Asia.

“It is very disturbing to see that the conflict has worsened,” Zaw Nay Aung, a democracy activist, told Rendezvous in an e-mail on Wednesday. “The Burmese, the majority of whom are Buddhists, are Islamophobic.”

He said anti-Islamic pamphlets have lately been circulating in western Myanmar, stirring up fear and anger among the Buddhists there. Some believe the military-dominated government is behind the propaganda campaign.

“These small booklets are not officially published but rather secretly disseminated,” said Zaw Nay Aung, who called the pamphlets “hate-literature” that suggests global Islam has embarked on a plan to make inroads into non-Muslim countries. The alleged methods in Myanmar are the practice of polygamy, the building and expansion o f mosques and the seeking of ethnic minority status for the Rohingya.

Zaw Nay Aung's pro-democracy group, Burma Independence Advocates, which is based in London, is preparing a report “about the regime's possible conspiracy on the communal strife,” he said.

“I think this whole mess is deliberately created by the regime to have an effect of rally-round-the flag,” he said. “Many people in Burma today support President Thein Sein for his stance on the Rohingya. He said he would run for a second term, and he's getting more and more support because of this religious/racial crisis.”

Aung Zaw, the Irrawaddy editor, described one theory that “the strife was intended to allow the Burmese armed forces, or Tatmadaw, to return to the spotlight.”

“In the past,” he said, “the former junta launched several military campaigns against the Rohingya - and every time the Burmese people rallied behind the military.”



The Making of Angela Merkel

PARIS- I have long been fascinated by Angela Merkel - a woman who has risen to power in a conservative country where most women still find it hard to get to the top; an East German who seemed untrammeled by the mediocrity, the torpor and the generally loathsome atmosphere of mistrust that permeated that drab Communist state. I spent many years covering the Soviet bloc, relishing the great friendship and conversation you could enjoy behind closed doors. I am also married to a Russian pianist and composer, Sergei Dreznin, and I had the great good fortune to be in East Berlin the night the wall fell in 1989, 23 years ago next week. Probably it was all that - and Ms. Merkel's intelligence - that led me to want to know more about how she came from small-town surroundings to the pinnacle of German politics.

My article in The New York Times this morning dwells on how the Chancellor's training as a physicist has influenced and informed her approach to politics. Less obvious in that version was her young life in East Germany. See below for more details from the longer version of the article that was published Tuesday in the International Herald Tribune, and let us know what your own impressions of Ms. Merkel are.

We will start right in with a passage that directly links to life in East Germany:

In conversation, or giving a speech, Ms. Merkel is above all alert, looking around, taking in all present. (In a 2010 interview with Bild am Sonntag, she noted that in East German daily life ‘‘you had to be very alert and organized - going into a shop you looked first to see what goods people were buying at the checkout, then searched for them yourself.'') When she lacks an immediate answer, or is weighing words especially carefully, her eyes flutter upward, searching for the right formulation as a pupil might scan her memory for an exam answer. Often, too, a smile dances somewhere around an enigmatic face.

After she entered German politics in 1990, winning election to Parliament and an immediate seat in Chancellor Helmut Kohl's cabinet, Ms. Merkel absorbed important lessons about gaining and defending power, and making the media her friend.

None of that was a given when the Berlin Wall fell in November 1989, opening up to Ms. Merkel and 17 million East Germans chances - and challenges - they had long desired but scarcely imagined.

Ms. Merkel was that rare East German born in the West - in Hamburg, on July 17, 1954 - and taken east when she was just six weeks old, because her father, Horst Kasner, a trained theologian, and her mother Herlind Jentzsch, a teacher of Latin and English, answered the Lutheran church's call for more pastors in the Soviet-controlled East.

‘‘It was my mission to go there,'' Mr. Kasner, who died last year, told Judy Dempsey of the International Herald Tribune in 2005. ‘‘After World War II, we were just thankful that we had survived.'' The manager of the moving company the Kasners used made plain how strange it was. ‘‘He said there were two kinds of people going over to the East - Communists, and real idiots.''

Ms. Merkel spent her formative years in Templin, a medieval town of about 17,000 some 80 kilometers, or 50 miles, north of Berlin in a lake-dotted region known as the Uckermark. Toward one edge of the town stands the Waldhof, a complex that includes a pastor's residence and the seminary where Mr. Kasner oversaw training for Lutheran priests. Erstwhile visitors recall a well-stocked library, including books from the West. Mr. Kasner, as he told Ms. Dempsey, led Friday night discussions of some 30 people, even mulling works by the Soviet scientist and dissident Andrei D. Sakharov.

Ms. Merkel's mother, barred as a pastor's wife from teaching in a Communist state, threw her energies into educating her children - Angela, her brother Markus, three years younger, and, later, Irene, 10 years Ms. Merkel 's junior. From the start, Angela Kasner excelled. By her own description, she loved company and - unusually for a pastor's child - was not only confirmed in the church, but joined both the Communist Young Pioneers and, later, the Free German Youth.

‘‘Childhood doesn't consist of politics alone and in this unpolitical sense I simply had a very good life,'' Ms. Merkel told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in May 2005. ‘‘My parents raised us with much love and gave us access to a broad education. We sang in the church choir - the church was a community of like-minded people. I learned very early that you can talk about anything amongst friends, but, outside that circle, you are cautious. Yet that didn't really bother me'' at least until ‘‘I got into situations that were no fun at all.''

One such situation arose in 1968. Ms. Merkel's first political memory, she told the Frankfurter Allgemeine, was the building of the Berlin Wall on Aug. 13, 1961, when she was just 7. ‘‘It was a Sunday,'' she recalled. ‘‘My father, as pastor, had a service. Everybody was crying.''

Seven summers later, she went to Czechoslovakia - her parents traveled to Prague to see firsthand the thrilling reforms taking place. Then, on Aug. 21, 1968, she heard on the radio that Russian troops had crushed the Prague Spring. ‘‘That was really terrible,'' she told Ms. Roll. She was about to convey this to her school class when the teacher grew visibly nervous. The future chancellor quickly adopted a poker face.

Listening to that story, Ms. Roll wrote, she understood the origins of Ms. Merkel's famously unreadable expression. ‘‘Yes,'' Ms. Merkel said, ‘‘it is a great advantage from the time in East Germany, that one learned to keep quiet. That was one of the strategies for survival. As it is today.''

Just off the central square in Templin, in a timbered building that in Communist times (and earlier) housed the local Sp arkasse, or savings bank, the beams bear carved mottos that Greeks and Spaniards now fear ring loud in Ms. Merkel's ears: ‘‘The saver of today is the winner of tomorrow,'' reads one. ‘‘It is not what you earn, but what you save, that makes you independent,'' says another.

Although Ms. Merkel left the town decades ago, she periodically returns to Uckermark for weekends in her small country house near Templin. On the drive west from town, toward the old highway to Berlin, first come villages little changed from East German days, then the rusting outskirts of what was a large Soviet base, a remnant of the vanished empire. Only people who lived through its dissolution and then labored to rebuild their lives can understand how profoundly shattering - and creatively formative - an experience it was.

The chancellor has recalled East Germany as a place where no one was pushed to excel. As a star student who graduated from Leipzig University in physics, then earne d a doctorate and knuckled down in a prestigious if obscure laboratory in East Berlin, she apparently never lost sight of the need to lift her head above that mediocrity, just as East Berliners used to climb high buildings to glimpse West Berlin.

Although few mourned East Germany, she knows firsthand the cost of collapse. It is interesting that, in rejecting the idea of euro bonds as a way to end the euro crisis, she told Parliament last June: Bonds ‘‘would turn mediocrity into Europe's yardstick. We would be abandoning our ambition of retaining our prosperity in worldwide competition.''

On the dizzying night of Nov. 9, 1989, when the Wall finally came down, Angela Merkel was, as ever, methodical. Like many others, she heard Günter Schabowski, a member of the ruling Communist Politburo, read the confusing announcement that East Germans were free to travel west. Ms. Merkel called her mother and told her to prepare her West German marks (families with relativ es in the West often received food, clothes and money). And she reminded her mother that they had always promised, if the Wall came down, to eat oysters together in the Kempinski Hotel in West Berlin.

Then, as always on Thursdays, Ms. Merkel went to the sauna with a girlfriend. Only afterward did she join the crowds surging through the newly opened Wall. Another biographer, Gerd Langguth of the University of Bonn, related that she briefly joined a West Berlin family at their home. The next morning, she was back in East Berlin - at work.

She, and her country, have traveled far since. Once past that rusting Soviet base, the road from Templin now passes dozens of wind turbines. After last year's tsunami and nuclear disaster in Japan, Ms. Merkel, the physicist accustomed to weighing risk, declared, to the horror of Germany's business community, that the country should shut down all atomic plants and become 80 percent reliable on renewables by 2050. The turbines symb olize her quest to reshape her country, and her continent.

Her critics may cite her hesitation and a general European lack of nerve as obstacles. But given the nature of Germany's federal system, which disperses power, Ms. Merkel has a lot more explaining to do - to her party, her coalition and her Parliament - than, say, any French president. And when she is determined, she is clear; no one, President François Hollande of France told European journalists this month, ‘‘can accuse Angela Merkel of ambiguity.''
She has often succeeded while being underestimated - as several political rivals, and her predecessors as chancellor, can attest.

Once famously known as ‘‘Kohl's girl,'' she turned on her erstwhile patron after he lost first the chancellorship and then his party chairmanship in 1998. Ms. Merkel became general secretary of the party - No. 2 to the new chairman, Wolfgang Schäuble (now her widely respected finance minister).

After 16 years in power, the Christian Democrats were consumed by a scandal involving millions of marks sloshing undeclared through party coffers. In December 1999, Ms. Merkel published a sensational article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, lamenting the ‘‘tragedy'' that had befallen the party, blaming Mr. Kohl and urging a new course. ‘‘We cannot avoid this process, as Helmut Kohl would doubtless be the first to understand,'' the article stated.

Critics see this as an extreme example of a tendency to turn on mentors or allies. Mr. de Maizière has lamented, for instance, that she has long avoided him (he declined, as did others, to be interviewed for this article). But many applauded Ms. Merkel's instinct to go to the heart of the matter. The fallout sidelined Mr. Kohl, and hurt his longtime associate, Mr. Schäuble. Ms. Merkel was elected party chairwoman in April 2000, and has held the post since.

Next, Mr. Schröder helped her, unwittingly. Reforms he enacted in his second term laid the groundwork for Germany's current primacy in Europe. But they were unpopular, and when Mr. Schröder's party, the Social Democrats, lost a key region in 2005 state elections, he called an early national election.

Ms. Merkel's Christian Democrats had no time to choose another candidate as chancellor. She was predicted to win clearly, and stunned when her party finished only just ahead of Mr. Schröder's. But, either elated by his success or tipsy from celebrating it, he declared on television that she could not possibly get his job - an arrogance that helped unite viewers and her party behind Ms. Merkel in difficult coalition negotiations. Five weeks later, aged 51, she was sworn in as chancellor.

Whether Ms. Merkel envisaged years at the pinnacle of German politics is one of the many things she has successfully kept to herself. ‘‘There are no leaks from this chancellery,'' noted Mr. Nowak, admiringly. Longtime aides are loyal, an d discreet - Ms. Merkel's right-hand woman, Beate Baumann, has been with her since the early 1990s.

So no one has ever said when and how Ms. Merkel - who married the physics student Ulrich Merkel in September 1977 but was divorced five years later - met her current spouse. In her doctoral thesis, submitted in January 1986, she thanked the man she would later marry, a chemistry professor, Joachim Sauer, for critical observations. Professor Sauer, five years older than Ms. Merkel, has two sons from a previous marriage, which Mr. Langguth writes ended in 1985. Professor Sauer has never given an interview about politics or his personal life.

More interestingly, of the dozen or so people interviewed for this article, nobody had a clear answer as to why Ms. Merkel entered politics, reached for the top, or works so hard to stay there. ‘‘I think she just grew into it,'' said Ms. Roll. Career women of Ms. Merkel's generation, she said, do not plan their ascent, ‘ ‘they just pass the test at each step'' along the way.

In August, the weekly magazine of Süddeutsche Zeitung asked 37 prominent Germans to pose the chancellor a question. The tennis star Boris Becker asked who she would invite to dinner, to which she replied, ‘‘I don't give dinner parties'' - then added that she would like to dine and mull tactics with Vicente del Bosque, coach of Spain's European and world champion soccer team.

The tennis star Andrea Petkovic asked whether she had a joke ready to tell. ‘‘Yes, always,'' replied the chancellor. But she did not reveal what it was.



The Making of Angela Merkel

PARIS- I have long been fascinated by Angela Merkel - a woman who has risen to power in a conservative country where most women still find it hard to get to the top; an East German who seemed untrammeled by the mediocrity, the torpor and the generally loathsome atmosphere of mistrust that permeated that drab Communist state. I spent many years covering the Soviet bloc, relishing the great friendship and conversation you could enjoy behind closed doors. I am also married to a Russian pianist and composer, Sergei Dreznin, and I had the great good fortune to be in East Berlin the night the wall fell in 1989, 23 years ago next week. Probably it was all that - and Ms. Merkel's intelligence - that led me to want to know more about how she came from small-town surroundings to the pinnacle of German politics.

My article in The New York Times this morning dwells on how the Chancellor's training as a physicist has influenced and informed her approach to politics. Less obvious in that version was her young life in East Germany. See below for more details from the longer version of the article that was published Tuesday in the International Herald Tribune, and let us know what your own impressions of Ms. Merkel are.

We will start right in with a passage that directly links to life in East Germany:

In conversation, or giving a speech, Ms. Merkel is above all alert, looking around, taking in all present. (In a 2010 interview with Bild am Sonntag, she noted that in East German daily life ‘‘you had to be very alert and organized - going into a shop you looked first to see what goods people were buying at the checkout, then searched for them yourself.'') When she lacks an immediate answer, or is weighing words especially carefully, her eyes flutter upward, searching for the right formulation as a pupil might scan her memory for an exam answer. Often, too, a smile dances somewhere around an enigmatic face.

After she entered German politics in 1990, winning election to Parliament and an immediate seat in Chancellor Helmut Kohl's cabinet, Ms. Merkel absorbed important lessons about gaining and defending power, and making the media her friend.

None of that was a given when the Berlin Wall fell in November 1989, opening up to Ms. Merkel and 17 million East Germans chances - and challenges - they had long desired but scarcely imagined.

Ms. Merkel was that rare East German born in the West - in Hamburg, on July 17, 1954 - and taken east when she was just six weeks old, because her father, Horst Kasner, a trained theologian, and her mother Herlind Jentzsch, a teacher of Latin and English, answered the Lutheran church's call for more pastors in the Soviet-controlled East.

‘‘It was my mission to go there,'' Mr. Kasner, who died last year, told Judy Dempsey of the International Herald Tribune in 2005. ‘‘After World War II, we were just thankful that we had survived.'' The manager of the moving company the Kasners used made plain how strange it was. ‘‘He said there were two kinds of people going over to the East - Communists, and real idiots.''

Ms. Merkel spent her formative years in Templin, a medieval town of about 17,000 some 80 kilometers, or 50 miles, north of Berlin in a lake-dotted region known as the Uckermark. Toward one edge of the town stands the Waldhof, a complex that includes a pastor's residence and the seminary where Mr. Kasner oversaw training for Lutheran priests. Erstwhile visitors recall a well-stocked library, including books from the West. Mr. Kasner, as he told Ms. Dempsey, led Friday night discussions of some 30 people, even mulling works by the Soviet scientist and dissident Andrei D. Sakharov.

Ms. Merkel's mother, barred as a pastor's wife from teaching in a Communist state, threw her energies into educating her children - Angela, her brother Markus, three years younger, and, later, Irene, 10 years Ms. Merkel 's junior. From the start, Angela Kasner excelled. By her own description, she loved company and - unusually for a pastor's child - was not only confirmed in the church, but joined both the Communist Young Pioneers and, later, the Free German Youth.

‘‘Childhood doesn't consist of politics alone and in this unpolitical sense I simply had a very good life,'' Ms. Merkel told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in May 2005. ‘‘My parents raised us with much love and gave us access to a broad education. We sang in the church choir - the church was a community of like-minded people. I learned very early that you can talk about anything amongst friends, but, outside that circle, you are cautious. Yet that didn't really bother me'' at least until ‘‘I got into situations that were no fun at all.''

One such situation arose in 1968. Ms. Merkel's first political memory, she told the Frankfurter Allgemeine, was the building of the Berlin Wall on Aug. 13, 1961, when she was just 7. ‘‘It was a Sunday,'' she recalled. ‘‘My father, as pastor, had a service. Everybody was crying.''

Seven summers later, she went to Czechoslovakia - her parents traveled to Prague to see firsthand the thrilling reforms taking place. Then, on Aug. 21, 1968, she heard on the radio that Russian troops had crushed the Prague Spring. ‘‘That was really terrible,'' she told Ms. Roll. She was about to convey this to her school class when the teacher grew visibly nervous. The future chancellor quickly adopted a poker face.

Listening to that story, Ms. Roll wrote, she understood the origins of Ms. Merkel's famously unreadable expression. ‘‘Yes,'' Ms. Merkel said, ‘‘it is a great advantage from the time in East Germany, that one learned to keep quiet. That was one of the strategies for survival. As it is today.''

Just off the central square in Templin, in a timbered building that in Communist times (and earlier) housed the local Sp arkasse, or savings bank, the beams bear carved mottos that Greeks and Spaniards now fear ring loud in Ms. Merkel's ears: ‘‘The saver of today is the winner of tomorrow,'' reads one. ‘‘It is not what you earn, but what you save, that makes you independent,'' says another.

Although Ms. Merkel left the town decades ago, she periodically returns to Uckermark for weekends in her small country house near Templin. On the drive west from town, toward the old highway to Berlin, first come villages little changed from East German days, then the rusting outskirts of what was a large Soviet base, a remnant of the vanished empire. Only people who lived through its dissolution and then labored to rebuild their lives can understand how profoundly shattering - and creatively formative - an experience it was.

The chancellor has recalled East Germany as a place where no one was pushed to excel. As a star student who graduated from Leipzig University in physics, then earne d a doctorate and knuckled down in a prestigious if obscure laboratory in East Berlin, she apparently never lost sight of the need to lift her head above that mediocrity, just as East Berliners used to climb high buildings to glimpse West Berlin.

Although few mourned East Germany, she knows firsthand the cost of collapse. It is interesting that, in rejecting the idea of euro bonds as a way to end the euro crisis, she told Parliament last June: Bonds ‘‘would turn mediocrity into Europe's yardstick. We would be abandoning our ambition of retaining our prosperity in worldwide competition.''

On the dizzying night of Nov. 9, 1989, when the Wall finally came down, Angela Merkel was, as ever, methodical. Like many others, she heard Günter Schabowski, a member of the ruling Communist Politburo, read the confusing announcement that East Germans were free to travel west. Ms. Merkel called her mother and told her to prepare her West German marks (families with relativ es in the West often received food, clothes and money). And she reminded her mother that they had always promised, if the Wall came down, to eat oysters together in the Kempinski Hotel in West Berlin.

Then, as always on Thursdays, Ms. Merkel went to the sauna with a girlfriend. Only afterward did she join the crowds surging through the newly opened Wall. Another biographer, Gerd Langguth of the University of Bonn, related that she briefly joined a West Berlin family at their home. The next morning, she was back in East Berlin - at work.

She, and her country, have traveled far since. Once past that rusting Soviet base, the road from Templin now passes dozens of wind turbines. After last year's tsunami and nuclear disaster in Japan, Ms. Merkel, the physicist accustomed to weighing risk, declared, to the horror of Germany's business community, that the country should shut down all atomic plants and become 80 percent reliable on renewables by 2050. The turbines symb olize her quest to reshape her country, and her continent.

Her critics may cite her hesitation and a general European lack of nerve as obstacles. But given the nature of Germany's federal system, which disperses power, Ms. Merkel has a lot more explaining to do - to her party, her coalition and her Parliament - than, say, any French president. And when she is determined, she is clear; no one, President François Hollande of France told European journalists this month, ‘‘can accuse Angela Merkel of ambiguity.''
She has often succeeded while being underestimated - as several political rivals, and her predecessors as chancellor, can attest.

Once famously known as ‘‘Kohl's girl,'' she turned on her erstwhile patron after he lost first the chancellorship and then his party chairmanship in 1998. Ms. Merkel became general secretary of the party - No. 2 to the new chairman, Wolfgang Schäuble (now her widely respected finance minister).

After 16 years in power, the Christian Democrats were consumed by a scandal involving millions of marks sloshing undeclared through party coffers. In December 1999, Ms. Merkel published a sensational article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, lamenting the ‘‘tragedy'' that had befallen the party, blaming Mr. Kohl and urging a new course. ‘‘We cannot avoid this process, as Helmut Kohl would doubtless be the first to understand,'' the article stated.

Critics see this as an extreme example of a tendency to turn on mentors or allies. Mr. de Maizière has lamented, for instance, that she has long avoided him (he declined, as did others, to be interviewed for this article). But many applauded Ms. Merkel's instinct to go to the heart of the matter. The fallout sidelined Mr. Kohl, and hurt his longtime associate, Mr. Schäuble. Ms. Merkel was elected party chairwoman in April 2000, and has held the post since.

Next, Mr. Schröder helped her, unwittingly. Reforms he enacted in his second term laid the groundwork for Germany's current primacy in Europe. But they were unpopular, and when Mr. Schröder's party, the Social Democrats, lost a key region in 2005 state elections, he called an early national election.

Ms. Merkel's Christian Democrats had no time to choose another candidate as chancellor. She was predicted to win clearly, and stunned when her party finished only just ahead of Mr. Schröder's. But, either elated by his success or tipsy from celebrating it, he declared on television that she could not possibly get his job - an arrogance that helped unite viewers and her party behind Ms. Merkel in difficult coalition negotiations. Five weeks later, aged 51, she was sworn in as chancellor.

Whether Ms. Merkel envisaged years at the pinnacle of German politics is one of the many things she has successfully kept to herself. ‘‘There are no leaks from this chancellery,'' noted Mr. Nowak, admiringly. Longtime aides are loyal, an d discreet - Ms. Merkel's right-hand woman, Beate Baumann, has been with her since the early 1990s.

So no one has ever said when and how Ms. Merkel - who married the physics student Ulrich Merkel in September 1977 but was divorced five years later - met her current spouse. In her doctoral thesis, submitted in January 1986, she thanked the man she would later marry, a chemistry professor, Joachim Sauer, for critical observations. Professor Sauer, five years older than Ms. Merkel, has two sons from a previous marriage, which Mr. Langguth writes ended in 1985. Professor Sauer has never given an interview about politics or his personal life.

More interestingly, of the dozen or so people interviewed for this article, nobody had a clear answer as to why Ms. Merkel entered politics, reached for the top, or works so hard to stay there. ‘‘I think she just grew into it,'' said Ms. Roll. Career women of Ms. Merkel's generation, she said, do not plan their ascent, ‘ ‘they just pass the test at each step'' along the way.

In August, the weekly magazine of Süddeutsche Zeitung asked 37 prominent Germans to pose the chancellor a question. The tennis star Boris Becker asked who she would invite to dinner, to which she replied, ‘‘I don't give dinner parties'' - then added that she would like to dine and mull tactics with Vicente del Bosque, coach of Spain's European and world champion soccer team.

The tennis star Andrea Petkovic asked whether she had a joke ready to tell. ‘‘Yes, always,'' replied the chancellor. But she did not reveal what it was.



Sandy Dominates European Headlines

LONDON - Four thousand miles and more away in Europe, the winds from Hurricane Sandy were strong enough to blow most other news off front pages and news bulletins on Tuesday.

Newspapers that closed their print runs before the storm struck the eastern seaboard of the United States in the early hours of the European day provided live updates on their Websites to bring news of casualties, flooding and blackouts.

Some European media gave the megastorm the kind of treatment normally reserved for domestic dramas.

Sky News, broadcasting from London, broke into its regular programming to go live to Mayor Michael Bloomberg's final briefing to the people of New York City on Monday night.

It was not just that the “mammoth and merciless storm,” as my colleague James Barron described it, was one of the biggest weather events ever to strike the United States. It was also the special status of New York, almost as familiar as their own cities to Europeans, even those who have never been there.

Britain's Daily Telegraph told readers how the approaching storm had closed “iconic streets” such as Park Avenue and Broadway, while Spain's ABC said the shutdown included the “iconic Apple store on Fifth Avenue.”

There was also an inevitable parochial accent to much of the coverage - the effect of cancelled flights on European travelers and the fate of tourists stranded on the other side of the Atlantic.

“U.K. pupils barricaded in hotel” was the headline on a diary item from Britain's ITV broadcaster. “Air France cancels all flights,” France's TF1 told its viewers.

Some complained that the media attention was overdone.

In a lively debate at Spain's El Pais, readers wanted to know why the threat Sandy posed to the United States received more coverage in the local media than 60 deaths the storm had already caused in the Caribbean and Central America.

While some blamed the obsessions of a pro -“yanqui” press, one commenter told them, “Like it or not, a storm that paralyses New York and Washington is of more interest to this newspaper's readers than the storm that is currently afflicting the Philippines.”

Journalistic obsession or not, public interest in the advance of Hurricane Sandy was credited with pushing up broadcast audiences in France. French media ran a report from the French news agency AFP on a climate conference in Lima in order to link Sandy to the phenomenon of global warming.

Other French Websites pointed to a report this month from Munich Re, the German-based reinsurer, which warned that, “nowhere in the world is the rising number of natural catastrophes more evident than in North America.”

“Among many other risk insights, the study now provides new evidence for the emerging impact of climate change,” Munich Re said.

Tim Stanley, a historian of the United States writing for the Daily Telegraph, drew no firm c limatic conclusions but said Hurricane Sandy was, “big weather for a big country.”

“Why can a disaster never just be a disaster?” he asked, referring to speculation about the impact of the storm on the American presidential election campaign. “A random freak of nature with consequences that are far more personal and serious than a few digits of momentum in a tawdry election.”

He added, “Is this overloading of opinion the product of a civilization with too much time on its hands and too little to say?”



Subjunctivitis

I try not to dwell on the subjunctive. It's grim terrain. Usually one rant a year or so is all I can muster, and I've covered my quota for this year.

But how can I ignore this recent spate of problems?

---

The Yankees would have an easier time scoring if Cano was more like his usual self.

But Cano is not playing as he usually does; that's the problem. So this is a contrary-to-fact condition and should take the subjunctive. Make it, “if Cano were more like …” (As a mnemonic device, my colleague Ken Paul invokes Tevye, a poor man but a fine grammarian: “If I were a rich man …”)

---

If there was no lockout, Kreider would have been playing in Los Angeles on Friday when the Kings raised their Stanley Cup banner.

Make it “if there were [or had been] no lockout.”

---

Rodriguez did not directly answer when asked if he were unhappy with Girardi.

Here's the inevitable overcorrection problem. This constructi on does not require a subjunctive; we simply need the past tense to follow sequence-of-tense rules after “asked”: “asked if he was unhappy.”

 
If It Were Easy, We'd Get It Right

Even when we know there's a problem, we're not always sure how to fix it.

---

An editorial originally said this:

But if he [Mr. Romney] succeeded in repealing the reform law, which has many provisions that hold down costs for Medicare enrollees, most beneficiaries would see their annual premiums and cost-sharing go up. The average beneficiary in traditional Medicare would pay about $5,000 more through 2022, and heavy users of prescription drugs about $18,000 more over the same period, if the act was repealed, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

---

Then an editor, apparently realizing that “was repealed” seemed wrong in this hypothetical condition, tried again for a later version, with this:

The average beneficiar y in traditional Medicare would pay about $5,000 more through 2022, and heavy users of prescription drugs about $18,000 more over the same period, if the act is repealed, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

The present indicative “is repealed” in the “if” clause (known as the “protasis” of the conditional sentence) would work best if the main clause (the “apodosis”) included a simple future tense: “The average beneficiary will pay … if the act is repealed.” But with the conditional “would pay,” it's better to use the subjunctive in the “if” clause: “if the act were repealed.”

---

There was a clue in the preceding sentence:

But if he succeeded in repealing the reform law, which has many provisions that hold down costs for Medicare enrollees, most beneficiaries would see their annual premiums and cost-sharing go up.

Why the past tense “succeeded” to describe a possible future action? It's not actually a past tense; that, too, is a subjunctive, correctly used here.

 
Close but Not Quite

These aren't exactly homonyms, but we were tripped up in a couple of recent cases by similar-sounding words.

---

On Sunday, more than 150 people gathered at Trinity Cemetery to celebrate the installation of a plaque commemorating Gen. Horatio Gates, who played a crucial role in the American Revolution but who, some say, was unfairly regulated to history's margins.

We meant “relegated.”

---

Is it unethical? Yes (although the value of one grape is so minor that it impedes on the livelihood of no one).

“Impede” is a transitive verb, so “impede on” is not correct. Possibly one could say “impedes the livelihood,” but more likely we meant “impinges on.”

 
In a Word

This week's grab bag of grammar, style and other missteps, compiled with help from colleagues and readers.

---

It's n ot clear what causes such large swings, although Gallup's likely voter model may have something to do with it.

Even their registered voter numbers can be volatile, however. In early September of this year, after the Democratic conventions, they had Mr. Obama's lead among registered voters going from seven points to zero points over the course of a week - and then reverting to six points just as quickly. Most other polling firms showed a roughly steady race during this time period.

Gallup is not a “they.”

---

And the goal is not just to reduce stress for employees, but for their families, too.

This construction is not parallel; make it, “to reduce stress not just for employees, but for their families, too.”

---

Similarly, the comments of a Venezuelan doctor in Naples, Fla., about the state of Mr. Castro's health raised eyebrows because of the source: Dr. Jose Marquina, a sleep specialist who claimed in April that Hugo Chávez , Venezuela's cancer-stricken president, was in his “last days.” (Mr. Chávez is not only alive, but he just won a heated presidential race this month).

The parentheses enclose a complete sentence, so the period should go inside.

---

The Third Way, a centrist Democratic organization, has calculated that limiting individuals to $17,000 dollars in deductions would only increase revenues by $1 trillion, less than a quarter of the $4.6 trillion cost of a 20 percent rate cut.

A surprisingly common error. Cut the word “dollars.”

---

The club's 2011 season was sullied by reports of disciplinary problems and ended with the departure of the longtime manager Terry Francona. It sunk even lower this year, with the Red Sox compiling a 69-93 record over a season pocked with messy conflict.

Use “sank” for the simple past tense.

---

How bad is it? They are left to channel the 2004 Red Sox for inspiration, Mike Vaccaro writes in The New York Post.

This use of “channel” has long since lost its freshness; let's resist it.

---

It was proverbially quiet in the Chloé showroom, three days before Ms. Waight Keller's spring runway show here, as critical decisions were being made about the hair and makeup, the order the clothes would be shown, whether the colors and proportions were just right.

Which proverb is that?

---

In Bernie Fine's case, the accusation alone cost him his job and his reputation. The chances of him ever coaching again at the college level are close to nil. The charges will cling to him for the rest of his life.

Make it “his ever coaching again.” In grammatical terms, “coaching” is a gerund - a verb form used as a noun - and is the object of the preposition “of.” In precise usage, “his” is required as a modifier for the gerund.

---

In 1982, there were about 2,900 providers nationwide; as of 2008, there were le ss than 1,800.

For things you can count, make it “fewer.”

---

From two different stories:

ALBANY - Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo may be coming to a swing state near you.

The no-limits giving that has let him do it might soon be coming to a campaign near you.

Two uses in one day suggest that this is acquiring cliché status.

---

[Caption] Colleen Stephens with a baby monitor that was once white in color but yellowed after being exposed to toxic drywall from China that contaminated her previous home in Virginia Beach, Va. Ms. Stephens said she took a financial loss by selling her old home in a short sale.

Rather than - white in shape?



Monday, October 29, 2012

A Closer Look at the American \'Pivot\'

HONG KONG - The United States still has tens of thousands of troops based in Europe, a full withdrawal from Afghanistan is two years away, Iran's nuclear program appears to be a crisis-in-waiting and the Middle East remains highly combustible. But as a senior American diplomat says, “the history of the 21st century is going to be written in the Asia-Pacific region,” which presents the opportunity for “an absolutely unique American role.”

The diplomat, Kurt M. Campbell, assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, is interviewed in a deft new documentary, “The Pivot,” which explains and explores the enhanced U.S. emphasis on Asia - militarily, diplomatically and economically.

The film, available here, is the latest in an excellent series of documentaries by the former CNN journalist Mike Chinoy, a senior fellow at the U.S.-China Institute at the University of Southern California.

The documentary features interviews with a ra nge of American diplomats - current and former - and scholars with long experience in Asia. Some offer their thoughts on what the upcoming election might mean for U.S. foreign policy in the region.

The Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, has a deep foreign policy bench, according to Richard Armitage, deputy secretary of state under President George W. Bush, and those advisers would likely ensure that “Asia policy would be relatively untouched,” Mr. Armitage said.

Some analysts fear that Mr. Romney's oft-stated promise to call out China for manipulating its currency will not bode well for bilateral relations. Such a move would mean “we're going to have a few years of very tough ties,” said Kenneth Lieberthal, a China scholar and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and co-author of “Bending History: Barack Obama's Foreign Policy.”

A former Chinese diplomat in Washington, Jia Xiudong, said in the film that he and other Chinese officials have been privately told to ignore the heated, anti-China rhetoric of this and previous campaigns. But if Mr. Romney is elected and carries through on his promise on the currency charge, it would be “the equivalent of declaring war, a trade war,” Mr. Jia said.

“Don't treat China as an enemy,” Mr. Jia advised. “Otherwise you end up with an enemy in China.”

“The fundamental reality is we're the two largest economies in the world for decades to come,” said Mr. Lieberthal. “We had better figure out how to make this work between the two of us.”

The administration, which has proclaimed Mr. Obama to be “our first Pacific president,” originally employed the word “pivot” to describe its new focus on the region. But U.S. diplomats now avoid the term.

“To some ears it has a bit of a military ring to it,” said Jeffrey Bader, a former senior director on the National Security Council in the Obama administration who is a senior fellow at Brookings.

So “pivot” is out. “Rebalancing” is in.

Whatever it's called, the new approach essentially involves deploying 60 percent of U.S. naval forces in the Pacific, a change from the previous 50-50 split between the Atlantic and Pacific commands. Six aircraft carriers will be part of the Pacific fleet.

Mr. Jia, the former diplomat, said many in China are convinced that the pivot is intended “to contain China.” And Mr. Chinoy, a veteran China hand, says that interpretation has become “a widely accepted narrative” on the mainland.

Mr. Campbell, however, rejects the containment notion, calling it “simplistic and wrong.”

Mr. Armitage rejects that view: “When the administration says it's not about China, it's all about China. China knows this.”

The pivot also involves bolstering alliances and friendships with an array of Asian nations, including India, and especially those that have been at odds with China in recent months - Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam and South Korea.

Multilateral institutions also have received more of Washington's attention, like the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the East Asia Summit. The next East Asia meeting is scheduled to be held next month in Phnom Penh, and Mr. Obama is expected to attend.



A Closer Look at the American \'Pivot\'

HONG KONG - The United States still has tens of thousands of troops based in Europe, a full withdrawal from Afghanistan is two years away, Iran's nuclear program appears to be a crisis-in-waiting and the Middle East remains highly combustible. But as a senior American diplomat says, “the history of the 21st century is going to be written in the Asia-Pacific region,” which presents the opportunity for “an absolutely unique American role.”

The diplomat, Kurt M. Campbell, assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, is interviewed in a deft new documentary, “The Pivot,” which explains and explores the enhanced U.S. emphasis on Asia - militarily, diplomatically and economically.

The film, available here, is the latest in an excellent series of documentaries by the former CNN journalist Mike Chinoy, a senior fellow at the U.S.-China Institute at the University of Southern California.

The documentary features interviews with a ra nge of American diplomats - current and former - and scholars with long experience in Asia. Some offer their thoughts on what the upcoming election might mean for U.S. foreign policy in the region.

The Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, has a deep foreign policy bench, according to Richard Armitage, deputy secretary of state under President George W. Bush, and those advisers would likely ensure that “Asia policy would be relatively untouched,” Mr. Armitage said.

Some analysts fear that Mr. Romney's oft-stated promise to call out China for manipulating its currency will not bode well for bilateral relations. Such a move would mean “we're going to have a few years of very tough ties,” said Kenneth Lieberthal, a China scholar and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and co-author of “Bending History: Barack Obama's Foreign Policy.”

A former Chinese diplomat in Washington, Jia Xiudong, said in the film that he and other Chinese officials have been privately told to ignore the heated, anti-China rhetoric of this and previous campaigns. But if Mr. Romney is elected and carries through on his promise on the currency charge, it would be “the equivalent of declaring war, a trade war,” Mr. Jia said.

“Don't treat China as an enemy,” Mr. Jia advised. “Otherwise you end up with an enemy in China.”

“The fundamental reality is we're the two largest economies in the world for decades to come,” said Mr. Lieberthal. “We had better figure out how to make this work between the two of us.”

The administration, which has proclaimed Mr. Obama to be “our first Pacific president,” originally employed the word “pivot” to describe its new focus on the region. But U.S. diplomats now avoid the term.

“To some ears it has a bit of a military ring to it,” said Jeffrey Bader, a former senior director on the National Security Council in the Obama administration who is a senior fellow at Brookings.

So “pivot” is out. “Rebalancing” is in.

Whatever it's called, the new approach essentially involves deploying 60 percent of U.S. naval forces in the Pacific, a change from the previous 50-50 split between the Atlantic and Pacific commands. Six aircraft carriers will be part of the Pacific fleet.

Mr. Jia, the former diplomat, said many in China are convinced that the pivot is intended “to contain China.” And Mr. Chinoy, a veteran China hand, says that interpretation has become “a widely accepted narrative” on the mainland.

Mr. Campbell, however, rejects the containment notion, calling it “simplistic and wrong.”

Mr. Armitage rejects that view: “When the administration says it's not about China, it's all about China. China knows this.”

The pivot also involves bolstering alliances and friendships with an array of Asian nations, including India, and especially those that have been at odds with China in recent months - Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam and South Korea.

Multilateral institutions also have received more of Washington's attention, like the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the East Asia Summit. The next East Asia meeting is scheduled to be held next month in Phnom Penh, and Mr. Obama is expected to attend.



Chancellor Merkel\'s Chance to Push Russia

BERLIN - Chancellor Angela Merkel is off to Russia in a few weeks. There, she will attend the regular Petersburg Dialogue.

Established in 2001 by her predecessor, Gerhard Schröder, the Petersburg Dialogue was supposed to bring together a cross section of Russian society and give the participants a platform to express their views, in order to encourage the country's transition to democracy.

It never achieved that.

On the contrary, the Petersburg Dialogue has become a talk shop, unwilling to question the economic, social or political policies of the Kremlin or deal with challenges affecting Russian society.

In my latest column, I write about the tangled and ever more troubled relationship between today's Russia and Germany, its most loyal European ally: Over the past few weeks, an increasing number of German politicians are questioning Berlin's special relationship.

Ms. Merkel has sometimes tried to raise issues in the context of the Petersburg Dialogue, especially Russia's weak rule of law and the pressure on non-governmental organizations, bloggers and the media generally. But her points have rarely been taken up by the participants.

Yet, surely such a forum would offer an ideal opportunity for the German side, which includes leading corporate executives, to speak out openly about Russia's pervasive corruption and how difficult it is to do business there. Surely, the one thing that companies want when dealing with any country is predictability, accountability and transparency.

Russia, however, is special. Germany, which is Russia's biggest trading partner in Europe, fears that it could lose out on contracts if it adopted a more critical stance towards the Kremlin. The big German companies that do business in Russia just don't want to rock the boat.

But what does that say about Germany's commitment to its values?

Ms. Merkel's own Christian Democrats are now speaking out against “Putin Tw o's” style of rule by calling for a much wider dialogue beyond the reach of the Kremlin and the oligarchs and the established lobbies.

Along with the opposition Greens and some Social Democrats, the Christian Democrats realize that Germany must deal differently with a Russia that is changing.

Will Mrs. Merkel set this train in motion when she meets Mr. Putin next month?



In London, Big Talent in Small Spaces

LONDON-Ah, the joys of being up close and personal. One thinks of Nicole Kidman in “The Blue Room,” an experience (in London, anyway) that had less to do with the virtues (or not) of David Hare's 1998 take on Schnitzler's theatrical daisy chain, “La Ronde,” and everything to do with an audience being able to see Tom Cruise's then-wife in the playhouse equivalent of their sitting room. And briefly â€" very briefly â€" naked, no less.

Or, earlier that same year, Kevin Spacey's barnstorming performance at the Almeida Theatre in “The Iceman Cometh,” the O'Neill epic that Mr. Spacey then took to the Old Vic and Broadway. Mr. Spacey's performance as the illusion-shattering Theodore Hickman never had quite the full-on power elsewhere that it achieved at the Almeida, a 325-seater that turned the audience into implicit barflies taking their places alongside the drink-sodden habitués of Harry Hope's saloon.

These shows and their stars have been in my mind am id a current theater season that boasts comparable intimacies between spectators and some mighty names. At 78, Eileen Atkins needs scant introduction as one of the leading actresses of a formidable generation that includes Vanessa Redgrave, Maggie Smith, Judi Dench, and Diana Rigg. So how unexpected â€" and enticing â€" it is to find Dame Eileen in a piece of Beckett esoterica called “All That Fall,” and within the confines of the Jermyn Street Theatre, a bijou venue that seats 70. Yes, 70.

You won't be surprised to hear that her star turn, on view at its current home through Nov. 3, has been rewarded with an upgrade. She and her co-star â€" a not inconsiderable presence of his own by the name of Michael Gambon â€" are transferring for 23 performances later next month to the larger Arts Theatre, near Leicester Square. The move increases the chances of people actually being able to see the director Trevor Nunn's take on a 1957 piece written for the radio that the Ir ish master had expressly said he did not want performed live. As if in concession to Beckett's wishes, Mr. Nunn's clamorous production dresses the stage with radio mikes, which combine with a busy array of sound effects to give the impression that we are in the recording studio.

But I, for one, am glad to have caught Ms. Atkins's witty and baleful performance from within what one might call spitting distance, if that term didn't seem too crude for a performer whose innate elegance comes through even when playing such an abject soul as Mrs. Rooney, who wants nothing more than to collect her blind husband (played by Mr. Gambon) from the railway station and lead him home.

It's partly that I relish the chance to hear the actress's way with the language of a playwright whose work, rather surprisingly, she has never done before. “Oh cursed corset,” she remarks near the start, the alliteration among the few playful aspects of a life that, one comes to realize, has n ot been kind to this often exasperated â€" and, probably, exasperating â€" woman.

Ms. Atkins has paired with Mr. Gambon before, on the 1998 London premiere of the Yasmina Reza play “The Unexpected Man,” which she subsequently took to New York with Alan Bates.

It does the sonorous Mr. Gambon no discredit (in what is a much smaller role) to point out that “All That Fall” belongs to its distaff lead. The staging may have about it a fussiness that comes from existing in limbo between live performance and its origins as something heard but not seen. But you simply have to witness Ms. Atkins in action â€" and, if possible, from a vantage point where those oval eyes look as if they could devour you whole.

Across town at the Almeida, another noted thesp, this one a two-time Tony winner, is giving us his long-awaited King Lear, a role we began anticipating from Jonathan Pryce when he appeared in March 2009, at the Donmar in “Dimetos,” a little-known Atho l Fugard play that allowed its leading actor moments of Lear-like fury and pain. (“Lear,” directed by the Almeida's artistic director Michael Attenborough, runs through Nov. 3.)

But as is sometimes the way of such things, Mr. Pryce's actual Lear isn't nearly as moving as was suggested by “Dimetos.” Sure, it's vaguely disconcerting to find directly before us the suggestion of Lear as an abusive, possibly incestuous father who plants a lingering smacker on his revulsed daughters' lips. And yet, what ought to be heightened about the experience in such close confines only makes one aware that the actor, who is 65, seems far too animated and vigorous for the part. (Among other things, Mr. Pryce may be the biggest Lear I have seen.) On this occasion, one wonders not so much whether Lear will go mad but what the king's exercise regime is: If this level of spryness is what growing older is like, bring it on.



How to Buy Art When Traveling Abroad

"The art world, really more than any other world I can think of, is a global village," says Barbara Gladstone, owner of the Gladstone Gallery.

Has Saving Energy Become the New Normal in Tokyo?

Tokyo Electric Power Company customers used 34.9 megawatts of energy this afternoon at five o'clock, up from 22.7 megawatts at 3 o'clock in the morning. Such arcane and precise information is a matter of common knowledge in Japan these days, where energy consumption rates are updated hourly and often reported alongside the weather forecast.

Since the meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in March 2011, the Japanese have had to learn to become strident energy savers. Due to extensive safety checks, just 2 of the more than 50 nuclear reactors that produced some 30 percent of Japan's energy before the disaster are still active, still leading to energy shortages in the country 19 months after the disaster. Since none of Tepco's 10 reactors are currently active, all of Tokyo's energy - 40 megawatts at any given time - comes from non-nuclear sources.

“Japanese consumers try to save more energy than before” March 2011, said Jiro Adachi, director gener al of the Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society, or JACSES.

The energy usage updates supplied by Tepco are color-coded, much like the U.S. Homeland Security Advisory System in place for most of the last decade. Green indicates that the power usage is within 90 percent of the country's energy capacity, yellow indicates that 90-95 percent of capacity is being used, orange tells Japanese consumers that they are using up to 97 percent of available energy and red is reserved for energy usage that comes close to reaching the total amount of energy available on any given day.

The “Setsuden” (“Energy Saving”) movement launched by the Japanese government in the wake of the Fukushima disaster and supported by the media was deemed a success and the government initially lifted restrictions on power use after the 2011 summer peak period.

While younger adults are more aware of the general need to conserve energy, explained Mr. Adachi, older adul ts understand that there is only a finite amount of energy available.

“Some people don't like such rationing, but many people are trying to reduce energy,” said Mr. Adachi, noting that consumers have reduced the use of lights and air-conditioning in the summer.

Consumers are also buying newer and more energy efficient appliances, he explained. His Tokyo-based non-governmental organization tries to raise public awareness and influence public policy around environmental issues.

Last year, Norimitsu Onishi of The New York Times reported on individual efforts to reduce power usage in a country that, though long obsessed with energy conservation, was forced to become even more efficient.

With the second summer's peak energy consumption period over and the memory of the nuclear meltdown in Fukushima receding, Mr. Adachi fears Japanese consumers might unlearn some of their good energy consumption habits.

“Little by little people are forgetting th e need to save energy,” he said.

Last month, Hiroko Tabuchi reported that Japan's prime minister, Yoshihiko Noda had abandoned Japan's post-Fukushima pledge to do away with nuclear power altogether by 2040. “A day earlier, the chairmen of Japan's most prominent business associations, including the influential Keidanren group, called a rare joint news conference to demand that Mr. Noda abandon the 2040 goal,” Hiroko wrote.

Even before the massive business lobbying, Rendezvous reported back in June that Mr. Noda had begged his countrymen to allow just such backtracking. We also asked which leader would be the next to make such an about-face, in the face of growing energy demands?

What do you think? Do consumers need immediate and concrete reasons to reduce thei reliance on energy, or can we learn to save energy without an immediate threat?



IHT Quick Read: Monday, Oct. 29

NEWS The Greek police arrested and then released the editor of an investigative magazine on Sunday after he published a list of more than 2,000 Greeks who were said to have accounts at a bank in Switzerland, throwing new controversy into a scandal over whether the government is pursuing suspected tax cheats. The moves, which tens of thousands of Greeks were following on the Internet, came days before Greece's European partners were to meet to decide whether to grant new aid to the struggling nation. Liz Alderman reports from Athens.

The sexual abuse scandal surrounding the television host Jimmy Savile widened Sunday after an arrest in connection with the case. British police arrested Paul Gadd, better known as Gary Glitter from the 1970s heyday of glam rock, who is a convicted pedophile. Nicholas Kulish reports from London.

The data collection practices of app makers like Rovio, maker of Angry Birds, are loosely regulated, but the European Union is working on proposals to get explicit consent from consumers to cull their personal information. Kevin O'Brien reports from Berlin.

EDUCATION The United Arab Emirates decided on a massive initiative to turn a product that was already popular with students into an academic tool, handing out 14,000 iPads to college students. Sara Hamdan reports from Dubai.

ARTS La Triennale Design Museum in Milan is celebrating the centenary of the lighting designer Gino Sarfatti's birth by exhibiting 200 of his “light fittings,” including some that he used in his home. Alice Rawsthorn writes from Milan.

SPORTS A high-level inquiry by auditors was ordered for a St. Petersburg construction project that has reached an estimate of $1.4 billion after a predicted $210 million cost. Anna Kordunsky reports from Moscow.

Now that Silvio Berlusconi has been convicted of tax fraud, his soccer team, A.C. Milan, struggles to holds its head above water in the Italian league. Rob Hughes o n soccer.



Sunday, October 28, 2012

Presidential Appointments to Keep

WASHINGTON - The next president will make many appointments with important policy implications. Three stand out: the secretaries of state and Treasury and later, the next chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.

If Mr. Obama is re-elected, the leading candidates to replace Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is stepping aside, are the United Nations envoy, Susan Rice, and Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Ms. Rice had been considered the favorite until she became ensnared in the controversy over the deaths of U.S. diplomats in Libya.

The most frequently mentioned appointee for secretary of state in a Mitt Romney administration is Robert Zoellick, the former deputy secretary of state in the George W. Bush years and later the head of the World Bank. He's the choice of the Republican foreign policy establishment, though the more unilateralist and aggressive neo-conservatives already are wag ing a campaign against him - part of the intra-party debate over foreign policy that I address in my latest Letter from Washington.

A Romney favorite is his top foreign policy adviser, Richard Williamson, who has held numerous diplomatic posts. Nonetheless, some question whether he has the gravitas for the job.

For Treasury, if Mr. Obama takes the conventional approach, he'll probably select Jacob Lew, White House chief of staff; some insiders speculate the president would have to go with someone with good ties to the business community.

Mr. Romney is likely to either choose a business executive or his top economic adviser, Glenn Hubbard, the dean of Columbia University's business school, who is lobbying for the job. Senator Rob Portman of Ohio, who is respected by Democrats as well as Republicans, is mentioned as a candidate for several top jobs.

Ben Bernanke's term as chairman of the Fed ends in a little more than a year, and Mr. Obama would probab ly pick either Janet Yellen, the vice chair of the Fed's Board of Governors, or a former vice chair, Roger Ferguson, as a way to ensure continuity.

Mr. Romney would likely go with the conservative Stanford University economist John Taylor, or Mr. Hubbard. Both have been highly critical of the Fed's efforts to stimulate the economy.



Corruption Probes in China Said to Rise 13 Percent

HONG KONG - China has become increasingly vigilant about ferreting out official corruption, bribe-taking and dereliction of duty, according to a report published Monday in the state-run media.

The authorities conducted 12.7 percent more investigations in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period last year, the China Daily newspaper said in its lead story.

More than three-fourths of the cases were for corruption and bribery, notably in the engineering, construction, rail and transportation sectors, and also in finance and real estate, the paper said. Its article cited remarks by Song Hansong, a director of the corruption prevention department of the Supreme People's Procuratorate.

In a preview of the important 18th Party Congress set to begin Nov. 8, the official Chinese news agency Xinhua said in a commentary that “unswerving efforts should be made to combat corruption and ensure clean governance.”

Mr. Song cited the case of Zhou Jinhuo , a former administrator in Fujian Province who has become a kind of poster boy for official malfeasance in China. For the past half-dozen years he has often been mentioned in anti-corruption stories, editorials and Communist Party campaigns.

Chinese authorities said Mr. Zhou took $16 million in bribes in exchange for the awarding of industrial and commercial contracts under his control. He wired the money abroad and then fled to the United States - following his wife, who had already obtained U.S. residency and a green card.

“He is still a fugitive there,” China Daily said.

A 2010 story in Global Times, a newspaper affiliated with the party, described Mr. Zhou's case and the graft-and-go phenomenon:

Chinese netizens coined the term luo guan (meaning naked officials), which refers to officials such as Zhou, who escape trouble by moving their spouse and children, along with their assets, to a foreign country.

They plan ahead by depositing money in accounts under the name of their spouse or children. Even if they are apprehended, the cash transferred to overseas banks often remain the property of family members.

An increasing number of officials engaging in this scam has frustrated investigators and have challenged the level of tolerance for such behavior among the public.

Rendezvous also reported this summer about luo guan:

Wealthy mainlanders, including government and party officials, are feverishly offshoring their cash by buying properties abroad, from Hong Kong and Macau to Australia, Europe and the United States. Hedging against possible political or economic upheavals, they are keeping so few (seizable) assets in China that they're being called luo guan - “naked officials.”

The Chinese business magazine Caixin reported earlier this year that China's central bank believes as many as 18,000 officials and employees of state-owned firms have left China since the mid-1990s, fleeing with an estimated $127 billion.

After staging its once-a-decade leadership transition next month, the party will undertake a five-year plan for eliminating corruption, Xinhua has reported, citing He Guoqiang, a member of the Standing Committee of the Politburo.

Mr. He, who oversees corruption enforcement within the party, called the effort a “dynamic and long-term strategic project.” The Xinhua report noted that “China has always paid great attention to fighting corruption and creating a clean government,” using “its own unique methods to combat corruption.”

Two disciplinary and watchdog agencies of the party said recently that nearly three-quarters of a million officials nationwide now receive anti-corruption education every year.

“Education is given through lectures, case studies and visits to historic areas, as well as attendance at court trials and talks with people who have been i mprisoned for corruption,” China Daily reported in its story about the party circular.

A county in Guangdong Province in southern China recently lectured the partners of more than 400 local officials in “how to prevent corruption,” China Daily reported. The attendees were taught “how to resist bribes and help their incumbent husbands and wives stay clean.”

“Those attending the class,” the paper said, “thought the initiative was informative and provoked deep thoughts.”



Mind Games and Trash Talk in India, as Vettel Wins and Alonso Brags

DELHI - A curious thing happened this weekend at the Indian Grand Prix outside Delhi. Each successive victory by Sebastian Vettel of Red Bull seemed to imbue Fernando Alonso of Ferrari with ever more confidence. Twice this weekend Alonso insisted that he will win this season's title, though he lost first place in the rankings to Vettel after Vettel's victory at the Korean Grand Prix two weeks ago. Alonso dropped behind by a further seven points on Sunday after Vettel again dominated the race and took his second victory in a row in the Indian Grand Prix - and his fourth victory in a row this season.

In fact, something fabulous is going on with Vettel. He has become the first driver to lead every lap of three races in a row since Ayrton Senna accomplished the feat in 1989. (When presented with that fact by Martin Brundle, a contemporary driver of Senna, Vettel looked abashed and asked that he please not be compared to such a great driver.

Alonso had said on Satu rday that he was 100 percent certain that he would win the title this year, not Vettel. And after Sunday's race, he said it again. Given Vettel's results, and the comparative speed of the Red Bull to Alonso's Ferrari, it is difficult to see how Alonso can come to that conclusion.

On the other hand, Alonso did prove a point by starting fifth and moving up to finish second. His Ferrari was undeniably better in the race than in the qualifying round.

But there could be another phenomenon going on here, something that usually has more to do with preparation for a heavyweight boxing title than a Formula One championship: In the last three seasons - two of which Vettel won - the German driver showed just how dangerous he is when his confidence is high. When Vettel is on a roll, he rarely makes a mistake, and when he gets a whiff of blood, he goes for the jugular. Alonso may well be trying to poke a hole in that confidence and, at he same time, pump up his own.

Wh atever the case, and whatever the result, it looks more likely now than ever that one of these two drivers - of the five remaining contenders - will take the title this season. They are in a race not just for this year's title, but also to become Formula One's youngest triple world champion in history. Since both are equally ferocious and talented, the final three races of this series promise to be a thrilling contest, a boxing match in three rounds.



Saturday, October 27, 2012

Chinese Censors Work to Quash Story on Vast Wealth of Prime Minister\'s Relatives

HONG KONG - Two attorneys in Beijing have released a statement challenging a story in The New York Times that documents some $2.7 billion in assets held by relatives of Wen Jiabao, the Chinese prime minister.

Carried on the front page of Sunday's editions of The South China Morning Post in Hong Kong, the statement called the Times report “untrue” and said that members of Mr. Wen's family “did not carry out any illegal business activity.”

“We will continue to make clarifications regarding untrue reports by The New York Times, and reserve the right to hold it legally responsible,” according to the statement from the lawyers, who said they had been “entrusted by the family members of Wen Jiabao” to issue it.

The original story, published Friday, had not been mentioned in Chinese state-run media by Sunday afternoon, and government censors moved to quash the story on various social media platforms, including the highly popular Twitter-like serv ice Sina Weibo.

China Digital Times, which monitors and reports on the Chinese media, compiled a list of some of the terms that the government has blocked on Sina Weibo in relation to the Times's story on the Wen-family wealth.

A number of combinations of words are blocked, including the Wen surname and “assets,” “wealth,” “family” and “prime minister.” The terms “Wen treasure,” “Wen clan” and “Wen emperor” are blocked. The number 2.7 billion is blocked.

Mr. Wen's name is routinely screened on Sina Weibo, as are the names of other senior government and Communist Party leaders. Mr Wen's nicknames, “Grandpa Wen” and “Best Actor,” also are verboten.

The name of his mother, Yang Zhiyun (杨志äº'), is now blocked. The name of his wife, Zhang Beili (张培莉), also is off-limits, along with her nicknames, “Diamond Queen” and “Lady Wen,” and the name of her jewelry company. The name of the Wens' only son is block ed - Wen Yunsong (温äº'松) - plus the terms “Young Master Wen” and “Crown Prince Wen.”

The New York Times (纽约时报) is banned for Sina Weibo users, along with “Twist Times” (扭腰时报). China Digital Times notes that “twist” (扭腰 niÇ"yāo), or “twisting waist dance,” sounds similar to New York (纽约 NiÇ"yuÄ").

A Chinese government spokesman told reporters on Friday that the story “smears China and has ulterior motives.”

The government moved quickly to block access to the English- and Chinese-language Web sites of The Times. The government spokesman said the firewalling was done “in accordance with laws and rules.”

Rachel Lu, a co-founder and editor at the Web site Tea Leaf Nation, writing on Foreign Policy magazine's Web site, cited this comment on Sina Weibo:

“In this day and age, no official is clean and I can accept that, but they shouldn't treat us like we are stupid. They fill up on abalone and lobsters in a five-star hotel, and then go to crowded street markets to buy cheap vegetables just to put on a show! I can't take that.”

My colleague Keith Bradsher, in reporting about the lawyers' statement and the Morning Post story, cites an e-mail statement from Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for The Times: “We are standing by our story, which we are incredibly proud of and which is an example of the quality investigative journalism The Times is known for.”

The original Times story, reported by David Barboza, did not allege any illegal business activity. It also said Mr. Wen appeared not to have accumulated assets himself.

“Wen Jiabao has never played any role in the business activities of his family members, still less has he allowed his family members' business activities to have any influence on his formulation and execution of policies,” said the lawyers' statement, issued by Bai Tao, a partner with the Jun He Law Of fices in Beijing, and Wang Weidong, managing partner at the Grandall law firm, also in the capital.

Ms. Bai has law degrees from Beijing University and Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, where her son is an undergraduate.

Mr. Wang's corporate biography says he has worked with General Electric, General Motors, I.B.M., Siemens, Coca-Cola, the Export-Import Bank of Japan and Electricité de France. He has law degrees from the People's Public Security University and the University of Minnesota.